Hetch Hetchy

It makes as much good sense to remove the Hetch Hetchy Dam (considering the water it stores can be easily stored in other ways) to provide access to the twin of Yosemite, as it does to construct the Auburn Dam to provide 500 year flood protection to Sacramento, and stabilize the river running through the Parkway.

Editorial: Hetch Hetchy
Parochial interests stymie restoration study
Published 12:00 am PDT Saturday, June 30, 2007

It’s hardly surprising that a key House panel rejected President Bush’s proposal to study how to restore Yosemite’s famously submerged Hetch Hetchy Valley.

Ever since Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco became House speaker, it was clear Bush’s proposal would go nowhere, and that John Muir would remain heartbroken, rolling over in his grave.

Pelosi and her powerhouse counterpart in the Senate, Dianne Feinstein, cling to fears that draining Hetch Hetchy would endanger San Francisco’s water and power supplies. Numerous California scientists say those supplies could be replaced by enlarging and revamping downstream reservoirs, but Pelosi and other Democrats in the House apparently don’t want such findings validated by a federal study.

About David H Lukenbill

I am a native of Sacramento, as are my wife and daughter. I am a consultant to nonprofit organizations, and have a Bachelor of Science degree in Organizational Behavior and a Master of Public Administration degree, both from the University of San Francisco. We live along the American River with two cats and all the wild critters we can feed. I am the founding president of the American River Parkway Preservation Society and currently serve as the CFO and Senior Policy Director. I also volunteer as the President of The Lampstand Foundation, a nonprofit organization I founded in 2003.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.