California’s Flood Risk, LAO Report

An excellent article from Mercury News reporting on the Legislative Analyst’s Office report.

An excerpt.

With its aging dams, collapsing levees and outdated flood control systems, a state report Wednesday said California is ground zero for devastating floods — as San Jose experienced last month — and that billions of dollars in additional funding is needed to fix decaying infrastructure.

The report from the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office found that one in five Californians live in a flood plain and an estimated $575 billion worth of structures are at risk of flood damage. But studies have estimated that reducing flood risk across the state will cost tens of billions of dollars above current expenditure levels over the next few decades, the report said.

The report follows a winter of historic rainfall that wrecked spillways and forced evacuations of 200,000 people near Oroville Dam. In San Jose, flooding along Coyote Creek prompted the evacuation of 14,000 residents and caused at least $100 million in damage.

“Much of the state’s extensive flood management infrastructure is aged and in need of improvements,” the report said. “As infrastructure ages, it faces a greater risk of malfunction and requires increasing maintenance and repair to remain effectual.”

In a different report obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, a federal team of experts warned of “very significant risk” if Oroville Dam’s main spillway is not operational again by the next rainy season. Repair crews at Lake Oroville dam have only a few months to make sure the damaged spillway is in good enough shape for the next rainy season, which starts in November.

In San Jose, flood protection work since the 1990s kept the Guadalupe River within its banks during the recent storms. But similar flood protection for Coyote Creek is still in the planning stages. Anderson Dam near Morgan Hill, which controls water flow along Coyote Creek, is in need of an earthquake safety overhaul.

One of the biggest challenges, according to the state LAO report, is that funding for flood control is limited and inconsistent. Several studies show that upgrading the state’s current flood management system will cost billion of dollars above the current $2 billion to $3 billion annual expenditures.

While most of the money for flood management comes from a local level, the state spent an annual average of $2.8 billion on flood control from 2000 to 2010, according to a 2013 report by the Department of Water Resources and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Public Policy Institute of California in 2014 estimated the state spent $2.2 billion a year from 2008 and 2011.

But that falls significantly short of what’s needed to upgrade flood systems and reduce risk in California.

About David H Lukenbill

I am a native of Sacramento, as are my wife and daughter. I am a consultant to nonprofit organizations, and have a Bachelor of Science degree in Organizational Behavior and a Master of Public Administration degree, both from the University of San Francisco. We live along the American River with two cats and all the wild critters we can feed. I am the founding president of the American River Parkway Preservation Society and currently serve as the CFO and Senior Policy Director. I also volunteer as the President of The Lampstand Foundation, a nonprofit organization I founded in 2003.
This entry was posted in Shasta Auburn Dam. Bookmark the permalink.